← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18987/2017bail granted

Indal Kumar @ Indal Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2017-04-19Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18987 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -132 Year- 2016 Thana -SAHPUR District- PATNA ====================================================== Indal Kumar @ Indal Yadav .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Akhauri Kamal Kishore Sahay, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ahtash Ali Khan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-04-2017 This is an application for grant of bail for offences punishable under Sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-B) A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

Earlier petitioner has moved before this Court and his prayer for bail was rejected vide order dated 1.3.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 9857 of 2017 with liberty to renew his prayer for bail before the court concerned after six months in custody. Petitioner has moved before the court below after expiry of six months period in custody, but the court below has rejected his prayer for bail.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the earlier observation that petitioner may renew his prayer after completion

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18987 of 2017 (2) dt.19-04-2017 2/2 of six months in custody, let above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Danapur, Patna, in connection with Shahpur P.S. Case no. 132 of 2016, subject to the conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned. (ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudip/- U T