Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16691/2017bail granted

Ravi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-04-06Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16691 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -185 Year- 2016 Thana -BARH District- PATNA ====================================================== Ravi Kumar Son of Ashok Ram, resident of village - Dariyapur, P.S. Hatidah, District - Patna .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Gouranga Chatterjee, Advocate For the Opposite Party: APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 06-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 02.08.2016 in connection with Barh P.S. Case No. 185 of 2016 for the alleged offences under Sections 392/395 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated as the first information report is against unknown persons. No recovery of any incriminating materials has been made from his possession. No test identification parade has been conducted in order to identify the petitioner. Similarly situated coaccused Munna Kumar Rai has been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 2400 of 2017.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Barh, District Patna in connection with Sessions Trial No. 807 of 2016 arising out of Barh P.S. Case No. 185 of 2016 on the following conditions: - (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16691 of 2017 (2) dt.06-04-2017 2/2 petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Vikash Jain, J) B.T/Chandran U T