Pintu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.18597 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -67 Year- 2017 Thana -HULASGANJ District- JEHANABAD ======================================================
1. Pintu Kumar, son of Jayishwar Singh, resident of village- Bichhi, P.S. Manpur, District- Gaya.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raja Ram Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 5/ 19-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Hulasganj P.S. Case No.67 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 435, 325, 504, 506 Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that it is a case of land dispute. There is no specific allegation of assault against this petitioner. There is allegation of assault against co-accused Sudhir Kumar and Neeraj Kumar.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18597 of 2018 (5) dt.19-06-2018 2/2 six weeks from today in connection with Hulasganj P.S. Case No.67 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub Judge 4-cum-Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions: (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- U T