Vinay Kumar @ Vinay Kumar Sinha v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.21753 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -24 Year- 2015 Thana -PARWALPUR District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ======================================================
1. Vinay Kumar @ Vinay Kumar Sinha S/o Late Kalkand Singh R/o vill. - Isapur, P.S. Noorsarai, Distt. - Nalanda .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Kumar For the Opposite Party : Mr. Ambika Bhagat (Spl.App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 08-07-2015 Heard both sides.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Parwalpur P.S. case no. 24 of 2015, registered under Sections 341,323 and 379 of the IPC and section 3(viii), (x) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
It is contended that both the parties being the responsible teachers have subsequently resolved the dispute. Admittedly, from bare perusal of the FIR it would appear that any such insinuation was not in public view.
Considering the nature of allegation and the submission of the petitioner, I am persuaded the to extend him the privilege of anticipatory bail.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21753 of 2015 (2) dt.08-07-2015 2/2 is inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Let the petitioner, named above, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M. Hilsa, Nalanda in connection with Parwalpur P.S. case no. 24 of 2015, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors shall be the own/close family member of the petitioner.
(ii) As soon as the charges are framed the petitioner shall appear in person before the trial court on the date(s) fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the trial Court shall have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner and secure his arrest in accordance with law.
(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) Shyam/- U T