Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18882/2017dismissed

Kishan Sah @ Krishna Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2017-04-25Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No 18882 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -367 Year- 2016 Thana -MOTIPUR District- MUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Kishan Sah @ Krishna Sah, S/o Badeo Sah, Resident of VillageBhikanpura, P.S.- Ahiyapur, Dist.- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr Sunil Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr Amitesh Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 25-04-2017 Heard the parties.

This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Motipur Police Station Case No 367 of 2016 for the offences under Sections 395, 379 and 412 of Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is named in the first information report. It is further submitted on behalf of the petitioner that except the fact that the petitioner is named in the FIR, there is nothing against him. Nothing has been recovered from his possession and he has not been put on test identification parade and later on, there is a confessional statement of petitioner himself in this case. It is further submitted that petitioner is in custody for about four

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18882 of 2017 (2) dt.25-04-2017 2/2 months.

Heard learned APP also. Learned APP opposed the prayer stating that the petitioner is named in the FIR and allegation is there in his confessional statement also along with the fact that four other such type of cases have been registered against him. Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. However, the learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) M.E.H./- U T