← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./38339/2026disposed

Vinod Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2026-06-18Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38339 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-134 Year-2026 Thana- AMNAUR District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Vinod Rai S/o Bachcha Rai @ Buchcha Rai @ Ganesh Ray R/o vill - Shekhpura, P.S.- Amnour, Dist.- Saran 2.

Amit Kumar @ Golu Kumar S/o Surendra Ray R/o vill - Shekhpura, P.S.- Amnour, Dist.- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anuj Kumar Shrivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-06-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have antecedent of two cases, out of which, one case is under the Excise Act and allegation is of recovery of 600 litres of liquor from house of Virendra Sah. It is next submitted that petitioners were not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from their conscious possession and even alleged recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38339 of 2026(2) dt.18-06-2026 2/3 and they have no relation or concern with Virendra Sah and they came to be implicated at the instance of chowkidar with whom they are on an inimical term. It is also submitted that once an accused is implicated in a case relating to excise, the police starts implicating mechanically either through chowkidar, local person, confessional statement or secret information without holding a proper investigation.

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Amnour P.S. Case No.134/2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

6. It is made clear that thereafter the learned trial court thereafter shall verify the criminal antecedents of the petitioners and in the event if it is found that petitioners have antecedent of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38339 of 2026(2) dt.18-06-2026 3/3 more than two cases, in that event, it would be presumed that petitioners had concealed their antecedent before this court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed with respect to those petitioners whose criminal antecedent does not tally but if after verification the criminal antecedent as recorded hereinabove tallies with the petitioners in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T