Dankal Kumar @ Chhotu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28196 of 2016 (2) dt.13-07-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.28196 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -349 Year- 2015 Thana -SAHARSA District- SAHARSA ====================================================== Dankal Kumar @ Chhotu Kumar Son of Maheshwar Prasad Yadav Resident of Village -Dharahara Dhatta, P.S. Raghopur, District - Supaul. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Subesh Sharma,Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey(APP222) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 13-07-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected by order dated 29.01.2016, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 57774 of 2015 in the light of observation made therein as the petitioner was given liberty to renew his prayer for bail after remaining further four months in custody. The petitioner is in custody since 06.05.2015. Other co-accused have been allowed bail The learned APP now does not oppose the prayer of bail.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28196 of 2016 (2) dt.13-07-2016 execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 349 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) ravi/- U T