Robing Tamang @ Robin Tamang v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41132 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-165 Year-2024 Thana- AIRPORT District- Patna ====================================================== Robing Tamang @ Robin Tamang S/o Late Mahesh Kumar Tamang R/o Bihar Special Armed Police, P.S.- Hawai Adda, Distt.- Patna and Currently residing at House DB/183, AU Road, BAU Campus, P.S.- Kanke, Distt.- Ranchi, Jharkhand ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Chandrasen Prasad Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-07-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 336(3), 340(2) and 318(2) of the BNS, 2023.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that that petitioner, based on forged and fabricated certificate, got appointed as a Constable on 28.10.2022.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant, it is next submitted that prior to instituting the instant FIR, no show cause was issued to the petitioner. It is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41132 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026 2/3 further submitted had an explanation been sought from the petitioner with regard to his certificate, perhaps the instant FIR would not have been instituted. It is also submitted if privilege of anticipatory bail is granted, petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove his innocence.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Hawai Adda P.S. Case No. 165 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of BNSS.

7. However, it is made clear that if the Investigating Officer of the case files an application before the learned Trial Court bringing to its notice that petitioner despite giving assurance to this Court is not cooperating in the investigation,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41132 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026 3/3 the learned Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after recording reasons.

8. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) rajesh/- U T