Chandra Bhushan Singh @ Gholti Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37296 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-130 Year-2019 Thana- BALIYA District- Begusarai ====================================================== CHANDRA BHUSHAN SINGH @ GHOLTI SINGH Son of Late Rishi Singh Resident of Village - Bariyarpur, P.S.- Balia, District - Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Pritish Kumar Lal, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Madhura Nand Jha, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 01-07-2021 As prayed for, let the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office vide its notes dated 18.12.2020, within four weeks of starting of Court proceeding in physical mode in normal course. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State through video conferencing. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Balia P.S. Case No. 130 of 2019, registered under Section 30 (a), 38(i) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, pending in the court of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-IIcum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Begusarai. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner submits that the prayer for pre-arrest bail of the petitioner was
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37296 of 2020(2) dt.01-07-2021 2/2 refused on 15.07.2019 vide Criminal Miscellaneous No. 43368 of 2019 with observation to surrender before the trial Court and seek regular bail. Further submission is that, in fact, prayer for pre-arrest bail of the petitioner was refused on the ground that 492.625 litres of liquor recovered from the thatched house of Raushan Singh, who is son of the petitioner, and Raushan Singh has already been allowed privilege of pre-arrest bail on 04.12.2019 vide Criminal Miscellaneous No. 79317 of 2019. Since, the prayer for pre-arrest bail of the petitioner has already been refused on merit, as such, I am not inclined to reconsider the prayer for pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail stands rejected.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T