Sunil Tanti v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38450 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-24 Year-2026 Thana- CHANDRAMANDI District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.

Sunil Tanti son of Kartik Tanti Resident Of Village- Chandramandi, PsChandramandi, Dist- Jamui 2.

Kundan Tanti @ Kundan Kumar @ Kundan Kumar Tanti Son of Shyam Sundar Tanti Resident Of Village- Chandramandi, Ps- Chandramandi, DistJamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rabindra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 16-06-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State, Mr. Rabindra Kumar.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 109(1), 132, 125(a), 125(b), 351(2) and 352 of the BNS, 2023.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that during immersion of goddess Saraswati, the accused persons including the petitioners created ruckus and pelted stones at the police force and four named accused persons got arrested and rest fled and their names transpired based on video footage and from rural sources.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38450 of 2026(2) dt.16-06-2026 2/2 informant, it is next submitted that petitioners are resident of a place nearby to the place of occurrence and when ruckus was created, they out of inquisitiveness came to the place of occurrence and came to be implicated. It is reiterated and submitted that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the anticipatory bail application of the petitioners.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Chandramandi P.S. Case No. 24 of 2026 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

7. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application is allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T