Kundan Kumar @ Kundan Kumar Tanti @ Kundan Kuma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37623 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-52 Year-2025 Thana- CHANDRAMANDI District- Jamui ====================================================== Kundan Kumar @ Kundan Kumar Tanti @ Kundan Kuma S/O Munna Tanti R/o Village- Dhamaniya P.S.- Chandramandi, Dist.- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Akash Raj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-06-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 74, 329(4), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that petitioner entered her house and tried to disrobe her when her husband came for having his food and saved her.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant at the instance of her husband. It is further submitted that petitioner is an electrician and is a friend of the husband of the informant and on the date of occurrence he was invited for lunch and thus had gone there but then an altercation took place in between him and the husband of the informant and the informant intervened when

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37623 of 2025(2) dt.18-06-2025 2/2 she was pushed as such it appears that thereafter the instant FIR came to be instituted by way of afterthought. It is next submitted that petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove his innocence.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Chandramandi P.S. Case No. 52 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

7. However, if the investigating officer of the case files an application before the learned trial court bringing to its notice that the petitioner despite giving assurance to this Court is not cooperating in the investigation, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T