Dev Kumar Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39919 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-104 Year-2019 Thana- EKMA District- Saran ====================================================== DEV KUMAR MAHTO Son of Hardeo Mahto Resident of vill.- Narhani, P.S.- Ekma, Dist.- Saran at Chapra.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nawal Kishore Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madhuri Lata, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 447, 341, 323, 324, 307, 354, 379, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant alleges that petitioner misbehaved with her and assaulted by an iron rod causing injury on head of her mother-inlaw, further, Munchun Mahto assaulted her mother-in-law by knife on palm and Shivnath snatched chain.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that even injuries suffered are simple in nature, it is next submitted that petitioner will not evade the law, rather, will cooperate in the investigation and will appear as and when required by the Investigating Officer.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39919 of 2022(2) dt.08-12-2022 2/2 Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Ekma P.S. Case No. 104 of 2019 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

Further, in the event if the Investigating Officer of the case files an application before the learned Trial Court bringing to its notice that the petitioner despite giving assurance to this Court is not cooperating in the investigation or is not making himself available as and when called, the learned Trial Court, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, shall pass orders in accordance with law and shall also have the liberty to cancel his bail bonds. (Satyavrat Verma, J) HarshPandey/- U T