Ashok Mahto @ Rahul Jee @ Vijay Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.34088 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -23 Year- 2016 Thana -IMAMGANJ District- GAYA ====================================================== Ashok Mahto @ Rahul Jee @ Vijay Singh, Son of Late Govardhan Mahto, Resident of village Chandri, P.S. Pratap Pur District-Chatra (Jharkhand). .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Paras Nath For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 17-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner is accused in connection with Imamganj P.S. Case No. 23 of 2016, registered under Section 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-b)a/26/ 35 of the Arms Act.
The accusation is that on receiving secret information about gathering of miscreants for preparation of committing dacoity, Police apprehended six persons including the petitioner. On search, the petitioner was found in possession of one country made pistol and six live cartridges. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been implicated in this case mere on suspicion.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34088 of 2016 (2) dt.17-08-2016 2/2 Further submission is that petitioner is accused in two other cases, as detailed in para-03 of the petition, but in both cases petitioner is on bail and in this case he is in custody since 24.02.2016.
Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Imamganj P.S. Case No. 23 of 2016. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the parents/close relative of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit showing his relation with the petitioner.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.) manish/- U T