Sentu @ Md Shakir @ Md Sagir v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43150 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-87 Year-2020 Thana- DIGHALBANK District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Sentu @ Md Shakir @ Md Sagir S/O Noor Alam @ Nuhu Ali R/O VillageMohmari, Ps. Dighalbank, Dist. Kishanganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amal Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 10-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 414 and 413/34 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the learned court below.

3. As per the prosecution case, when the informant checking vehicle along with his police team. At that time he saw a motorcycle coming from dighalbank when he along with other police officials tried to stop the motorcycle but the rider tried to escape who was apprehended after too much efforts. In the meantime, localities gathered there and in their presence the apprehended person was interrogated who revealed his named as Md. Haroom S/o. Rafique Alam.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner is made accused on the basis of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43150 of 2023(2) dt.10-08-2023 2/2 confessional statement of the co-accused. He submits that there is no any incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He further submits that there is no evidence against the petitioner to show that the petitioner has committed the offence or had involved in the alleged crime. He further submits that petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes for prayer for bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, named above, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court below, where the case is pending/Successor court, in connection with Dighalbank P.S. Case No.87 of 2020, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T