Patna High CourtCWJC/8446/2015disposed

Mukti Sinha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-02-02Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8446 of 2015 =========================================================== Mukti Sinha daughter of Late Amul Prasad, wife of Babua Nand Sharma, resident of village + P.O.- Kab Mahadev Asthan, P.S.- Rani Talab, District -Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary Health Department, New Secretariat Building, Patna.

2. Director -in-chief, Health Services New Secretariat, Bihar, Patna

3. Director, Health Service, Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

4. Deputy Director, Health Services, Bihar, New Secretariate, Patna

5. Civil Surgeon -cum-C.M.O.Patna near Civil Court , P,O.- Bankipur, District- Patna.

6. Medical Officer, In-Charge PHC, Bikram, P.O.-Bikram, District- Patna.

7. Medical Officer, In-charge PHC, Paliganj, P.O- Paliganj, District- Patna.

8. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. Amar Nath Singh, Advocate For the Accountant General : Mr. S.M. Ehtesham, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey, AAG-15 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 02-02-2017 Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Patna and the Incharge Medical Officer, Paliganj are present in the Court.

2. Heard Mr. Amar Nath Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey, learned counsel for the State and Mr. S.M. Ehtesham, learned counsel for the Accountant General.

3. In the present writ application the petitioner has prayed for a direction to the respondents to make payment of her retiral dues.

4. It is admitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that during pendency of the application the grievances of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.8446 of 2015 dt.02-02-2017 2/2 petitioner have been redressed.

5. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of.

6. As the writ application itself has been disposed of personal appearance of the two officers, who are present in the Court is dispensed with.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) Md.S./- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 4.2.2017 Transmission Date