Shailendra Kumar Singh @ Chhoto @ Nonhaki v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49854 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-47 Year-2021 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Samastipur ====================================================== Shailendra Kumar Singh @ Chhoto @ Nonhaki Son of Suresh Prasd Singh Resident of Village - Siropatti Sirha, P.S.- Khanpur, Distt.- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vinay Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anand Mohan Prasad Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 21-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that on 14.07.2021, when the informant was not at home then her neighbour, the petitioner, called her minor daughter namely, Pretma Johsi aged about seven years to his home and committed wrong with her. when informant come back, her daughter told the entire story then she taken to hospital from where, she was asked to go Mahila Police Station and subsequently, this F.I.R has been lodged. The girl was examined and her statement was recorded under section 164 of the Cr.P.C and the victim supported the prosecution case.

It is submitted on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner that there is a land dispute between the parties and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49854 of 2021(3) dt.21-04-2022 2/2 this petitioner happens to be co-sharer of the land in question and he has been falsely implicated in this case. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and drawn the attention of this Court to the statement of other witnesses as well as statement of victim recorded under section 164 of the Cr.P.C as well as medical report, which corroborate the prosecution case.

Having considered the nature of accusation and gravity of the offence in as much as the age of the vicitm, this court is not inclined to grant privilege of bail to the petitioner and accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected. However, it is expected that the learned trial court will take necessary steps to conclude the trial of the petitioner as early as possible.

(Harish Kumar, J) N.K/- U