Parmeshwar Ray @ Parmeshwar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39458 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-115 Year-2025 Thana- EKMA District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Parmeshwar Ray @ Parmeshwar Yadav S/o- Late Dharmnath Ray Resident of Village- Phuchati PS- Ekma, Dist- Saran 2.

Rohit Ray @ Indrashan Ray S/o- Vinayak Ray Resident of VillageDayalpur Pashchim Tola PS- Janta Bazar, Dist- Saran 3.

Shailendra Ray @ Tiyayee Resident of Village- Dayalpur Pashchim Tola PSJanta Bazar, Dist- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Chetna, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 324(4), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. As per the prosecution case, on 18.3.2025 at about 7.30 P.M., all the accused persons including these petitioners, armed with iron rod, lathi etc., came to the shop of informant and on the order of petitioner no. 1 other accused persons started demolishing the shop. It is further alleged that petitioner no. 3 assaulted with iron rod on the head of informant and when relatives of informant came to save him, they were also assaulted by accused persons, due to which, son of informant

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39458 of 2025(4) dt.27-08-2025 2/2 sustained fracture injury. The accused persons also looted cash and goods from the shop of informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that due to petty dispute, Maarpeet took place. Injuries, allegedly caused by these petitioners, are simple in nature. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the bail petition.

6. Considering the nature of injury and clean antecedent, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Saran at Chapra / concerned Court in connection with Ekma P.S. Case No. 115 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T