Bhola Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6959 of 2017 (3) dt.24-03-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.6959 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -186 Year- 2015 Thana -WAJIRGANJ District- GAYA ====================================================== Bhola Manjhi S/o Late Baldeo Manjhi Resident of Village-Amaitha, P.S.Wazirganj, at District-Gaya.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajy Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 24-03-2017 Heard the parties.
This application has been filed in connection with Wazirganj P.S.Case No.186 of 2015 for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 325, 302, 367 and 120(B)/201 of the Indian Penal Code.
It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is general and omnibus allegation of assault against the petitioner and the other co-accused persons and other co-accused persons have been granted bail by this Court, vide order dated 28.09.2015 passed in Cr. Misc. No.39074, dated 04.11.2015 passed in Cr. Misc. No.30953 of 2015, dated 28.04.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No.11540 of 2016, dated 06.10.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No.41767, dated 26.05.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No.22743 of
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6959 of 2017 (3) dt.24-03-2017 2016. The petitioner is in custody since 22.08.2016. Heard learned A.P.P., who could not controvert the above facts.
Having heard both sides and in view of above facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate- Ist Class at Gaya in connection with Wazirganj P.S.Case No.186 of 2015.
With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U