Birju Raj v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36137 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-121 Year-2020 Thana- KAKO District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Birju Raj Son of late Rajnandan Sao Resident of Village Islamchak P.S. Kako District- Jehanabad.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Paras Nath, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Nirmal Kumar Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 26-03-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.
Counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 448, 323, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Later on Section 307 of I.P.C. has been added.
Allegation against the petitioner is that he assaulted the informant by means of lathi, due to which he sustained injuries.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36137 of 2020(2) dt.26-03-2021 2/2 allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is a case and counter case between the parties. Free fight is alleged to have taken place. The injuries on the side of the accused persons have not been explained by the prosecution. The prosecution has not come with clean hands. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Jehanabad in connection with Kako P.S. case No.121 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T