Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18698/2017bail granted

Sintu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-05-11Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18698 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -197 Year- 2016 Thana -CHARIABARIYARPUR DistrictBEGUSARAI ======================================================

1. Sintu Kumar, son of Ram Dhiyan Mahton, resident of VillageKhokshaha, P.S.- Bibhutipur, District- Samastipur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Narsingh Tanti ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 11-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Cheria Bariarpur P.S. Case No. 197 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25 (1-b) A/26/35 of the Arms Act. Allegedly, the petitioner and others were apprehended when they were assembled to commit crime and from possession of the petitioner one live cartridge was recovered. Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Nothing was recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner and without any fault

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18698 of 2017 (2) dt.11-05-2017 2/2 he is suffering in custody since 02.12.2016.

The learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer of bail. In the facts and circumstances stated above, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Manjhoul, Begusarai in connection with Cheria Bariarpur P.S. Case No. 197 of 2016 subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) sushma/- U T