Sanjeev Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No 19702 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -182 Year- 2016 Thana -CHARIABARIYARPUR DistrictBEGUSARAI ====================================================== Sanjeev Kumar, son of Naresh Mahto, Resident of Village - Izraha, PS - Khodabandpur (Chhaurahi OP), District - Begusarai .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr Suraj Narayan Pd Sinha, Sr Advocate with Ms Nita Kumari, Advocate For the S t a t e : Mr Nirmal Kumar Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-04-2017 Heard the parties.
Petitioner has earlier moved this Court and his prayer for bail was rejected vide order dated 17.02.2017 passed in Cr Misc No 6941 of 2017 with an observation that he may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge in this case. It has been submitted that charge has already been framed in this case and he has remained in custody for more than five months and he has no criminal antecedent.
Heard learned APP also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bonds of Rs 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19702 of 2017 (2) dt.26-04-2017 2/2 to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Majhaul, District - Begusarai in connection with Cheria Bariyarpur Police Station Case No 182 of 2016. With following conditions:
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the Court and in the event of failure on his part to appear before the Court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) M.E.H./- U T