← Library
Patna High CourtL.P.A/1674/2014dismissed

Ratan Jamadar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-05-10Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1674 of 2014 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3219 of 2014 ===========================================================

1. Ratan Jamadar Son of Late Chhanguri Jamadar, Resident of Mariam Nagar, P.S. K. Hat, District - Purnea.

.... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Human Resources development Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

2. The Director, Secondary Education, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate, Purnea.

4. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Purnea Division, Purnea.

5. The District Education Officer, Purnea.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 10-05-2017 Seeking exception to an order dated 20th of October, 2014 passed by the learned Writ Court in C.W.J.C. No.3219 of 2014, this appeal has been filed under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent. Petitioner sought compassionate appointment after the death of his father which took place way back in the year 2007. Finding that as per the policy of the Department for grant of compassionate appointment, compassionate appointment in the Department can only be made on the post of Panchayat teacher or

Patna High Court LPA No.1674 of 2014 dt.10-05-2017 2/2 Block Teacher and finding that the petitioner does not have the qualification necessary for appointment on the said post and further finding that after more than seven years compassionate appointment cannot be granted, the writ petition has been dismissed. In doing so, we are of the considered view, the learned Writ Court has not committed any error warranting re-consideration. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Sudhir Singh, J) K.C.jha/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 16.5.2017 Transmission Date N/A