Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18952/2017dismissed

Munna Singh @ Munna Kumar Singh v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-05-02Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18952 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -290 Year- 2016 Thana -MUZAFFARPUR SADAR DistrictMUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Munna Singh @ Munna Kumar Singh, S/o Ram Naresh Singh, resident of Village- Katra, P.S. Katra, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. State Bank of India through Chief Manager Rajeev Kumar Singh, Agricultural Development Branch, Muzaffarpur. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Chandra Shekhar Anand For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Sahin Begam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 02-05-2017 Heard the parties.

This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with S.Tr. No.767 of 2016, Sadar P.S.Case No.290 of 2016 for the offences under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and later on, his name transpired in this case during the course of investigation. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that except confessional statement of the co-accused, there is nothing against the petitioner and there is no recovery and he was not put on T.I.P. It is further submitted that the petitioner is accused in other cases also but in all those cases, he has been remanded after arrest in this case and he is in custody since 1.7.2016.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18952 of 2017 (2) dt.02-05-2017 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. as well as learned counsel for the S.B.I. Learned counsel for the S.B.I. has opposed the prayer for bail and further drawn my attention towards impugned order, in which it is mentioned that at Para 30 of the case diary it has been mentioned that when a raid by made by S.I.T. along with the Police, two persons started fleeing and they were apprehended but the petitioner was not arrested at that time. Having heard both sides and in view of the allegation, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, however, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner. With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U