Ramu Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36675 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-66 Year-2017 Thana- GHOSWARI District- Patna ====================================================== RAMU PASWAN Son of Shankar Paswan Resident of Village - Samachak, P.S.- Barbigha, District - Sheikhpura.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Tej Narayan Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rana Randhir Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 21-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner has been in custody since 22.10.2017 in connection with Ghosbari P.S. Case No. 66/2017 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302/120(B)/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected with liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer after framing of charge.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that now the charge has been framed and since the petitioner has been in custody for over a year, he may be extended the privilege of bail.

In view of the aforementioned facts and circumstances and also the period of custody, let the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36675 of 2019(2) dt.21-06-2019 2/2 above named be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-II, Barh, Patna, in connection with Ghosbari P.S. Case No. 66/2017, subject to the following conditions:-

(1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, brother, sister and/or his wife.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) Saif/- U T