Sone Lal Sah @ Sone Lal Saw v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.8961 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -12 Year- 2017 Thana -SURYAGARHA District- LAKHISARAI ====================================================== Sone Lal Sah @ Sone Lal Saw, son of Mukho Sah @ Mukho Saw, resident of village - Katehar, Baulipar, Police Station Suryagarha, District - Lakhisarai .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha with Mr. Rabi Bhushan, Advocates For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Suryagarha P.S.Case No. 12 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273, 290 of the Indian Penal Code and 30(a), 32(c) and 38(d) of Bihar Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has clean antecedent and allegation against him is of recovery of 19 litres of foreign liquor and he is in custody for more than one month.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and considering the fact that petitioner has clean antecedent and has remained in custody for one and a half months, let the petitioner, above named, be released

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8961 of 2017 (2) dt.27-02-2017 2/2 on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai, in connection with Suryagarha P.S.Case No. 12 of 2017, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move the cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U