Vijay Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38084 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-154 Year-2022 Thana- KUNDWACHAINPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== Vijay kumar Singh Son of Late Indradev singh R/V Hasanpur Bairiya PS -Kundwachainpur Dist -East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anuj Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Arun Kumar Pandey, A.P.P.

For the Informant :

Mr.Sumit Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER 04-07-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Kundwachainpur P.S. Case No. 154 of 2022 registered for the offences under Sections 302, 120B, 34 of I.P.C. and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 27, 35 of Arms Act.

3.

As per the prosecution case, the informant has alleged that his brother Suresh Singh @ Mastanji was a Mahanth in the Hanuman Temple and some local men suspected that he wanted to capture the land of the mandir. Therefore, they fired at the informant's brother, who succumbed to his injuries.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38084 of 2025(2) dt.04-07-2025 2/3 petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the instant case. Further submission is that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and subsequently, his name has transpired in the statement of the co-accused persons. It is next submitted that the allegations levelled against the petitioner are general and omnibus in nature. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has clean antecedent.

5.

Learned counsel for the informant as well as learned APP for the State have jointly opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties and also considering the fact that the petitioner has been summoned under Section 319 of Cr.P.C. and also that there are general and omnibus allegations against the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Kundwachainpur P.S. Case No. 154/2022 subject to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38084 of 2025(2) dt.04-07-2025 3/3 conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure / Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

7.

This application stands disposed of.

(Sourendra Pandey, J) tusharika/- U T