Sujit Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40078 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-91 Year-2023 Thana- RAJAPAKAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== SUJIT DAS Son of late Devan Das @ Late Devanand Ram Resident of village - Andharwara Parati Naya Tola, P.S. - Rajapakar (Baranti O.P.), Distt. - Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manish Chandra Gandhi For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jagdhar Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 24-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against the petitioner along with others is of killing the daughter of the informant.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. He has committed no offence. Petitioner is the husband of the deceased. There is no eye-witness of the alleged occurrence and only, on the basis of suspicion, petitioner has been made accused in this case. He submitted that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40078 of 2023(3) dt.24-08-2023 2/2 marriage of the informant's daughter was solemnized in the year 2014 and she died in the year 2023, which shows there was no motive behind the occurrence. There is no any prior complaint regarding assaulting, harassment and torturing to the deceased against the petitioner and others. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. He is languishing in judicial custody since 15.04.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below in connection with Rajapakar P.S. Case No. 91 of 2023.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U T