Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36834/2016bail granted

Shashi Bhushan Singh @ Fauzi @ Shashi Bhushan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2016-10-25Mr. Justice Hemant Kumar Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.36834 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -341 Year- 2013 Thana -RAXAUL DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Shashi Bhushan Singh @ Fauzi @ Shashi Bhushan Singh, Son of Suresh Prasad Singh, Resident of Village- Paghiya, P.S.- Kathaiya, DistrictMuzaffarpur, Bihar. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Sri Braj Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 25-10-2016 Heard.

Two country made pistols, seven live cartridges, mobile sets, some foreign currency notes and other articles are said to have been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner for which petitioner is in jail custody since 30.11.2013. Petitioner does have criminal antecedent of near about sixteen cases but the report of the learned Court below goes to show that up-till now only two prosecution witnesses could be examined. Therefore, it is obvious that there is no possibility of conclusion of trial of the petitioner in near future.

Considering the period of detention of the petitioner in jail custody as well as facts and circumstances of the case, let

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36834 of 2016 (3) dt.25-10-2016 2/2 the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM, East Champaran in connection with Raxaul P.S.Case No.341 of 2013 subject to the condition that he shall attend the Trial Court on each and every date in person for the period of six months or till conclusion of his trial which ever is earlier and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates without any reasonable cause, the learned Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. It is also made clear that if petitioner is found indulged in another case after grant of bail, the learned Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner on the prayer of prosecution after making due and proper enquiry.

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) B.Kr./- U T