Chandal Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36392 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-641 Year-2018 Thana- LAKHISARAI DistrictLakhisarai ====================================================== CHANDAL MANDAL, aged about 20 years, male, Son of Ganesh Mandal Resident of Village - Chhoti Kabaiya, Lal Babu Gali, Ward No. 25, P.S.- Kabaiya, Dist.- Lakhisarai.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party:

APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 12-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 14.10.2018 in connection with Lakhisarai (Kabaiya) P.S. Case No. 641 of 2018 for the offences alleged under Sections 399/402 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-b)A/26/35 of the Arms Act.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with recovery of arms and ammunition upon arrest of four persons including the petitioner from the house of Anik Mistri. Similarly situated co-accused Sumit Kumar @ Murari has been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 29838 of 2019. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, let the petitioner above named be

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36392 of 2019(2) dt.12-06-2019 2/2 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai, in connection with Lakhisarai (Kabaiya) P.S. Case No. 641 of 2018, on the following conditions- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U T