Jai Kant Yadav @ Jaikant v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46911 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -3 Year- 2008 Thana -MADHEPURA District- MADHEPURA ====================================================== Jai Kant Yadav @ Jaikant S/o Late Raghunandan Yadav Resident of Village Nawad, Police Station Beldour, District Khagaria. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Viveka Nandsingh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 23-04-2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Having regard to the nature of allegation against the petitioner for offence under Sections 406, 409, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 472 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and the fact that the petitioner was not named in the FIR wherein the complicity is only against one Amit Anand alleged to have cheated the informant and the fact that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent, this Court would direct that if the petitioner namely, Jai Kant Yadav @ Jaikant surrenders before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in connection with Madhepura P.S.Case No. 03 of 2008, subject to the following conditions: (i) That both the bailors will be close family relatives of the petitioner, who will undertake an affidavit giving genealogy as to how they are related with the petitioner. The bailors will also undertake to inform the court if there is any change in the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46911 of 2014 (2) dt.23-04-2015 2/2 address of the petitioner.

(ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail.

(iii) That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned, if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of his bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each and every date in course of trial and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled on this ground alone.

(Mihir Kumar Jha, J) Sujit/- U