Ram Dhayan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40210 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-303 Year-2021 Thana- KHUSRUPUR District- Patna ====================================================== RAM DHAYAN SINGH Son of Sundar Singh Resident of - Chhota Hasanpur, P.S.- Khusrupur, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jharkhandi Upadhyay For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Upendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 21-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 325, 307, 506 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the learned court below.

Petitioner along with other co-accused persons armed with deadly weapons is said to have assaulted the informant due to which he received injury.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that there is general and omnibus

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40210 of 2022(5) dt.21-02-2023 2/2 allegation against the petitioner. He submits that there is no any weapon in the hands of the petitioner. He further submits that petitioner has got one criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.

Per contra, learned APP for the State vehemently opposing the bail application and submitted that the bail application of the other co-accused persons was rejected by the this Court vide order dated 25.07.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 4333/2022. It is further submitted that from perusal of the injury report and case diary it appears that there is multiple injury including one stab wound. Hence, he does not deserve anticipatory bail.

Considering the nature of the offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with Khushrupur P.S. Case No. 303/2021. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is hereby rejected.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T