Shikha Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18119 of 2011 ====================================================== Shikha Kumari Wife Of Shri Santosh Kumar Jha Resident Of VillageChainpur, P.O. And P.S.- Bangaon, District- Saharsa .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar , Through The Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Bihar, Patna

2. The District Magistrate-Cum-Collector, Saharsa

3. The District Programme Officer, District- Saharsa

4. The Child Development Project Officer, Kahra Block, District- Saharsa

5. The Panchayat Secretary, Chainpur Gram Panchayat, Kahra Block, District- Saharsa

6. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Chainpur, Block- Kahra, DistrictSaharsa

7. Smt. Jyoti Kumari Wife Of Shri Ajay Kumar Resident Of VillageChainpur, Ward No. 8, P.S.- Bangaon, District- Saharsa

8. Smt. Sentu Kumari Wife Of Shri Paswan Kumar Jha Resident Of Village- Chainpur, P.S.- Bangaon, District- Saharsa .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Mishra For the Respondent/s :

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 29-06-2016 Sri Ashok Kumar Mishra , learned counsel for the petitioner, after some argument , in presence of learned AC to AAG - 10 as well as Sri Sharda Nand Mishra, learned counsel for the private respondent, makes a prayer for disposal of the present writ petition so that, petitioner may approach the Divisional Commissioner against the impugned order. The writ petition stands disposed of with an indication that if any petition is filed by the petitioner before the Divisional Commissioner within a period of eight weeks from today, the

Patna High Court CWJC No.18119 of 2011 (7) dt.29-06-2016 2/2 learned Divisional Commissioner may examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law preferably within a period of three months after hearing all the concerned parties. Since private respondent has already appeared, the court expects that she may participate in the proceeding before the Divisional Commissioner.

The writ petition with above observation stands disposed of.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) Praful/- U