Ramesh Singh @ Ramesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43646 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-796 Year-2022 Thana- FATUA District- Patna ====================================================== RAMESH SINGH @ RAMESH KUMAR SON OF LATE PYARE SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - JAFRABAD, PS- FATHUA, DISTT- PATNA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gouranga Chatterjee, Adv.

Mr. Sahil Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Anirvan Choudhuri, Adv.

Mr. Ujjwal Raj, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kumar Veerendra Narayan, APP.

Mr. Shaukat Alam, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 19-09-2023 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Fathua P.S. Case No. 796 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 307, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Allegedly, due to some altercation, petitioner fired upon the informant's wife causing injury above her waist.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to local enmity. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is totally false and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43646 of 2023(3) dt.19-09-2023 2/2 based on concocted facts. He was not present at the place of occurrence. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant opposes the prayer for bail and submits that there is specific allegation against the petitioner that he fired upon the informant's wife due to which she sustained grievous fire arm injury above her waist, hence he does not deserve anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of case as well as nature of the injury sustained by the injured i.e. grievous, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T