Subodh Rai @ Suvodh Rai v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.15095 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -316 Year- 2016 Thana -VAISHALI District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Subodh Rai @ Suvodh Rai, Son of Mahendra Rai, Resident of VillageChak Raj Ali, P.S. Patori, District- Samastipur. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nilesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 10-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Vaishali (Belsar) P.S. Case No. 316 of 2016, registered under Sections 399, 402 and 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 25(1-b)a, 25 and 35 of the Arms Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would appear from the F.I.R. that seven persons were apprehended by the Police, who were making plan to commit dacoity. The apprehended persons disclosed that they have also looted organic fertilizer and the said organic fertilizer has been kept in the house of petitioner. Thereafter, Police recovered the said organic fertilizer from the house of the petitioner. Further submission is that the petitioner was apprehended on 07.12.2016,
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15095 of 2017 (3) dt.10-05-2017 2/2 thereafter, the petitioner has been remanded in two other cases, as detailed in paragraph No. 3 of the petition. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Vaishali (Belsar) P.S. Case No. 316 of 2016. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit showing his relation with the petitioner.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T