Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36413/2019bail granted

Hareram Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2019-06-12Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36413 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-189 Year-2019 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Hareram Sah (M) aged about 32 years, Son of Sukhdev Sah Resident of Village - Rasalpur, P.S.- Chak Mehsi, District - Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Sanjay Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 12-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 11.04.2019 in connection with Sitamarhi Excise Case No. C2/189/2019 for the offences alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with recovery of 90 litres of Nepali liquor. The petitioner has already suffered for more than two months in custody. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District Judge II-cum-Special Judge, Excise, Sitamarhi in connection with Sitamarhi Excise Case No. C2/189/2019, on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36413 of 2019(2) dt.12-06-2019 2/2 offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (iv) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Vikash Jain, J) BT/- U T