Chandan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.33031 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -34 Year- 2016 Thana -DARAUNDA District- SIWAN ====================================================== Chandan Kumar, Son of Dinesh Ray @ Dinesh Prasad Ray, resident of village- Daraunda, Pipra, P.S. - Daraunda, District- Siwan .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party: APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 20-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is in custody since 04.03.2016 in connection with Daraunda P.S. Case No. 34 of 2016 for the offences alleged under Sections 364/120B of the Indian Penal Code and later on, section 302/34 of the IPC has been added.
3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and no role has been assigned to the petitioner. The thrust of accusation made in the FIR appears to be against coaccused namely Vivek Kumar Singh, Raj Kumar Thakur and Sonu Kumar. Similarly situated co-accused Rani Devi has been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 28709 of 2016.
4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in connection with Daraunda P.S. Case No. 34 of 2016 with the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33031 of 2016 (2) dt.20-08-2016 2/2 following conditions:
(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence.
(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned (Vikash Jain, J) B.T/-Ibrar U T