Raj Kumar Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37682 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-149 Year-2024 Thana- LODIPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Raj Kumar Ranjan S/o Sukhdeo Prasad@Shukdev Prasad Singh Resident of Sikanderpur, P.S.- Mojahidpur, District- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sarandha Suman- Advocate For the State :
Mr. Anil Kumar- A.P.P.
For the Informant :
Mr. Shatabdi Sinha- Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-06-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in Lodipur P. S. Case No.149 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The learned A.P.P., at the outset, submits that the offences for which the instant FIR has been instituted carries punishment of seven years and less the said submission is not disputed by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the informant, as such, the learned A.P.P. submits that the case be disposed of in terms of order dated 13.02.2024
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37682 of 2025(2) dt.18-06-2025 2/2 in Cr. Misc. No.3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. the State of Bihar) as investigation in the case is still continuing.
4. At this stage, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant submits that the petitioner was issued notice under Section 41(A) of the Cr.P.C., but then, the reason best known the petitioner chose not to appear and has moved before this Court seeking anticipatory bail when the offences for which the instant FIR has been instituted carries punishment of seven years and less.
5. At this stage, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application with liberty to avail his remedy in accordance with law.
6. Permission is accorded.
7. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T