Rambachan Sah @ Rambachchan Sah @ Bachchan Sah v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12018 of 2017 (2) dt.27-03-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12018 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -13 Year- 2017 Thana -MUFFASIL DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ====================================================== Rambachan Sah @ Rambachchan Sah @ Bachchan Sah, son of Late Gobardhan Sah, resident of Village- Pipara Pakadi, Police Station- Bettiah Muffasil, District- West Champaran at Bettiah..... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghunandan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Vinod Shankar Modi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 27-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bettiah Muffasil P.S. Case No. 13 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30 (A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Allegedly, from possession of the petitioner 5 liter country made liquor was recovered and the petitioner was apprehended. Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner has been made victim of circumstances, he is suffering in custody since 18.01.2017 and as such he deserves sympathetic consideration.

Learned APP fairly submits that considering the period of detention now lenient view can be taken.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12018 of 2017 (2) dt.27-03-2017 In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah in connection with Bettiah Muffasil P.S. Case No. 13 of 2017, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T