Patna High CourtCR. MISC./9734/2012dismissed

Nandani Gupta v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-10-09Justice Smt. Anjana Prakash2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9734 of 2012 Arising Out of Chapra (Town) P.S. Case No. -69 Year- 2011 District- SARAN =========================================================== Nandani Gupta, W/O Sujit Kumar and D/O Baidyanath Prasad Gupta Resident Of Purani Bazar, Brahman Toli, Sonarpatti, Muzaffarpur, Police Station- Town, District- Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. Sujit Kumar, S/O Late Jagdish Prasad

3. Pramila Gupta, wife of late Jagdish Gupta Both resident of village- Ambara, Police Station- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur, at present residing at Mohalla- Karimchak, Arya Nagar, Police Station- Town, District- Saran AT Chapra .... .... Opposite Party/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Dr. Amrendra Kumar No. 1, Adv. Mr. R.S. Pankaj, Adv.

For the State : Mr. D. Mehta, A.P.P. For the Opposite Parties No. 2 and 3 : Mr. Dhirendra Mishra, Adv. =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amrendra Kumar @ Dr. Amre For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dasrath Mehta(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 09-10-2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State.

I find from the report of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra, that he has reported with regard to Chapra Town P.C. Case No. 59 of 2011 whereas the report was called for in connection with Chapra Town P.S. Case No. 69 of 2011.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9734 of 2012 (5) dt.09-10-2015 2/2 The Petitioner seeks transfer of Chapra Town P.S. Case No. 69 of 2011 from Saran (Chapra) Judgeship to Muzaffarpur Judgeship on the ground of convenience. Considering that it is a Police case and the Petitioner will be required to depose only once there, I see no reason that all the accused persons should be make to travel to Muzaffarpur, only for the convenience of one person. Hence, finding no merit in the application, the same stands rejected.

However, the Trial Court is directed to conclude the Trial positively within a period of six months from the date of receipt of this order without granting unnecessary adjournment to any Party.

(Anjana Prakash, J) S.Ali/- U T