Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43450/2024withdrawn

Amit Kumar @ Ramlal v. The State Of Bihar

2024-09-21Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43450 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-155 Year-2023 Thana- CHACKMEHSI District- Samastipur ====================================================== Amit Kumar @ Ramlal, Son Of Ramanand Khan Residents Of Village - Nawabganj, Police Station - Chakmehsi, District - Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bijay Bhushan Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anant Kumar 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 21-09-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in Chakmehsi P. S. Case No. 155 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is in custody since 17.03.2024 and is alleged to have assaulted the nephew of the informant on head by Garasa causing injury on head.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the injury suffered by the injured i.e. nephew of the informant (Pratik Prasad) is grievous in nature. It is also submitted that petitioner is not a criminal, but on account of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43450 of 2024(2) dt.21-09-2024 2/2 dispute relating to land, the occurrence took place in which both sides assaulted each other and from the side of the petitioner also Chakmehsi P. S. Case No. 163 of 2023 has been registered against the informant and his side.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application and submits that there is a specific allegation against this petitioner of assaulting by Garasa causing grievous injury to the injured. It is also submitted that the grievous injury is on vital part of the body.

6. The learned counsel for the petitioner, at this stage, seeks permission to withdraw the present regular bail application with liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.

7. Permission is accorded.

8. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T