Ram Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49104 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-140 Year-2021 Thana- RAFIGANJ District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.

Ram Kumar Yadav, S/O Gulaichi Yadav R/O Village- Simra Jamshed, P.S.- Rafiganj, District- Aurangabad 2.

Raunak Yadav, S/O Ram Kumar Yadav R/O Village- Simra Jamshed, P.S.- Rafiganj, District- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Mr. Pramendra Kumar Singh For the State :

Mr. Mohammad Sufyan For the Informant :

Mr. Lal Bahadur Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 04-07-2022 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner no.1, namely, Ram Kumar Yadav, during pendency of anticipatory bail application was arrested, as such, the present application against him has become infructuous and thus, he seeks permission to withdraw the present application against him.

Permission is accorded.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner no.2 and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner no.2 seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49104 of 2021(4) dt.04-07-2022 2/3 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is cousin brother. It is next alleged that on trivial issue, an occurrence took place in which, it is alleged that petitioner assaulted the informant by iron rod on his head causing injury. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from perusal of the injury report of the informant, it would manifest that he received simple injury on his wrist when the allegation in the F.I.R. is of causing injury on his head. The learned counsel for the informant as well as learned A.P.P.

opposes the bail application, but are not able to meet the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that informant has not received any injury on the head and the injury caused on the wrist is simple in nature. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Rafiganj P. S. Case No.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49104 of 2021(4) dt.04-07-2022 3/3 subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T