Patna High CourtCR. MISC./40436/2023dismissed

Chhotu Khan @ Munna v. The State Of Bihar

2023-09-06Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40436 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-63 Year-2022 Thana- AMAS District- Gaya ====================================================== CHHOTU KHAN @ MUNNA SON OF LATE RASHID KHAN VILLAGE ABZALPUR P S SHERGHATI DISTRICT GAYA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bhaskar Shankar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Brajendra Nath Pandey For the State :

Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 06-09-2023 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

3. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Amas P.S. Case No. 63 of 2002 registered for the offence under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

4. The office is directed to make necessary correction in pre-feeded header portion as the FIR is of year 2002 which is also clear from the FIR but pre-feeded header portion reflects the year of the case as 2022.

5. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner has committed loot in a bank along with other accused persons.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40436 of 2023(3) dt.06-09-2023 2/2

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case.

7. Learned counsel for the opposite party and learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and have submitted that the petitioner is involved in the crime and materials have come during investigation to connect the petitioner with the crime and the petitioner has a long list of 18 criminal antecedents.

8. Considering the facts, as mentioned above and also considering the criminal antecedents of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

9. Accordingly, the prayer of bail of the petitioner is rejected herewith.

10. The Court below is directed to expedite the trial. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Vikas/- U T