Patna High CourtCWJC/14626/2011disposed

Ishwari Dutta Verma v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-03-30Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14626 of 2011 ====================================================== Ishwari Dutta Verma S/O Late Raghunath Lal Verma, Panchayat Secretary At present posted in the office of Sub-Divisional Election Section, BagahaII, Distt.- West Champaran .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The District Magistrate, East Champaran

3. The District Panchayat Raj Officer, Distt.- West Champaran

4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Bagaha-II, Distt.- West Champaran

5. The Block Development Officer, Thakraha Block, Distt.- West Champaran .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Upendra Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. AC to AAG-9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 30-03-2016 Heard Sri Upendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AC to AAG-9.

The petitioner, in the present writ petition, has made a prayer for directing the Respondents to make payment of salary from the month of May 2009 to September, 2009, from December 2009 to February, 2010 and from December, 2010 to February, 2011 and also to pay Dearness Allowance.

In this case, earlier a counter affidavit was filed on behalf of Respondent nos. 2 to 5, wherein a stand has been taken that grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed. After noticing the facts mentioned in the counter

Patna High Court CWJC No.14626 of 2011 (8) dt.30-03-2016 2/2 affidavit, earlier learned counsel for the petitioner on 11.03.2016 sought time to verify as to whether the grievances of the petitioner were redressed or not but despite his best efforts, learned counsel for the petitioner is not able to get instruction. Accordingly, in view of facts disclosed in the counter affidavit, particularly the submission made by learned State Counsel that the grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed, there is no need to keep the matter pending. The writ petition stands disposed of. If the petitioner feels that any grievance still exists, he may approach the authority concerned.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) NKS/- U