Ranjan Sao v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37896 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2025 Thana- NAVINAGAR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Ranjan Sao S/o Suryapat Saw R/o Village- Devagna, P.S.- Nabinagar, District- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Mukul Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 25-06-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 352 and 351(2) of the BNS.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case and in sum and substance, the allegation against the petitioner is of assaulting the husband of the informant by an iron rod causing injury on head. It is further submitted that though petitioner is alleged to have assaulted the husband of the informant by an iron rod causing injury on head but then the allegation does not get corroborated by the injury report which records that injury on ulna of the husband of the informant was found grievous. It is next submitted that no injury was found on the head of the husband of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37896 of 2025(2) dt.25-06-2025 2/2 filing of the instant anticipatory bail application, she got a copy of the injury report and from perusal of the same, it would manifest that the injury report does not record any injury on the head, as such, it is submitted that whether the petitioner assaulted the husband of the informant or not is also doubted. It is further submitted that petitioner and the informant are agnates and are having dispute relating to property.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Nabinagar P.S. Case No. 10 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T