Usha Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1602 of 2011 ====================================================== Usha Devi Sri Narasinh Thakur Kachua, P.O. Sakla Bazar, P.S. Karakat, Distt. Rohtas .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary Human Resources Development Department Having His Office At Vikash Bhavan

2. The District Panchayati Raj Officer, Rohtas At Sasaram

3. The District Superintendent Of Deucation, Rohtas At Sasaram

4. The Block Development Offficer, Karakat, Gorari,Distt.Rohtas At Sasaram

5. The Block Education Extension Officer, Karakat Gorari, Distt.Rohtas At Sasaram

6. The Mukhiya Burhwal Gram Panchayat, P.S.Karakat , Distt.Rohtas At Sasaram

7. The Panchayat Secretary,Burhwal Gram Panchayat, P.S.Karakat , Distt.Rohtas At Sasaram

8. Sri Kashi Nath Singh, The Assistant Teacher High School Burhawal, P.S.Karakat , Distt.Rohtas At Sasaram

9. Shakuntla Pal D/O Shiv Shankar Pal Burhwal ,P.S.Karakat , Distt.Rohtas At Sasaram

10. The District Teacher Appointment Appellate Authority Rohtas At Sasaram Through Its Secretary, Dhanwantri Chitiksa Kendra , 3rd Floor Raj Colony, Sasaram, .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Maheshwar Dhar Dwivedi Sc ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

Since the matter relates to appointment of Panchayat teacher and this Court has been informed that the Bihar State Teachers Appellate Authority has started functioning, this writ application is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to file

Patna High Court CWJC No.1602 of 2011 (15) dt.05-12-2016 2/2 appeal before the State Appellate Authority within four weeks. In view of the fact that the petitioner is pursuing the remedy before this Court as this writ application is pending since 2011 and both sides agree not to raise the issue of limitation before the Appellate Authority, it is expected from the Appellate Authority to decide the matter expeditiously on merit in accordance with law without allowing the parties to raise the issue of limitation provided the appeal is filed within a period of four weeks.

Accordingly, the writ application is disposed of. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Amrendra/- U