Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29082/2016bail granted

Abhiram Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2017-03-02Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29082 of 2016 (6) dt.02-03-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29082 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -32 Year- 2013 Thana -BHEJA District- MADHUBANI ======================================================

1. Abhiram Yadav Son of Kaleshwar Yadav Resident of village - Tengraha, P.S. Bheja, Distt. - Madhubani .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Soban Asghar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Lakshmi Kant Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 02-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bheja P.S. Case No. 32 of 2013, G.R. No. 353/2013 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 504, 506, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that no injury has been caused to any one. There is allegation against seven accused persons for opening fire upon the informant but no injury of any kind has been found upon the person of the informant. The petitioner has been remanded in this case on 06.08.2015 and since then he is in custody and, as such, the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29082 of 2016 (6) dt.02-03-2017 The learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer of bail. In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the custody of the petitioner now, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Madhubani in connection with Bheja P.S. Case No. 32 of 2013, G.R. No. 353/2013 subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) sushma/- U T