Madan Singh v. Devendra Pr5asad Singh ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6764 of 2011 ====================================================== Madan Singh, son of Late Shyam Narayan Singh, r/o- village Bagra, P.S.- Mashrakh, P.O.- Kumarsan Bagra, District- Saran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Devendra Prasad Singh, son of late Shyam Narayan Singh,

2. Mamta Devi,

3. Meera Devi D/o- Late Shyam Narayan Singh, All resident of village Bagra, P.S.- Mashrakh, P.O.- Kumarsan Bagra, District- Saran

4. Yogendra Singh

5. Rajendra Singh

6. Birendra Singh

7. Harendra Singh All sons of Late Suraj Singh

8. Most. Tapesari Kuwar, wife of Late Suraj Singh All residents of village Bagra, P.S.- Mashrakh, P.O.- Kumarsan Bagra, District- Saran

9. Most. Yashoda Kuwar, wife of Late Surat Singh, r/o- village Dodhar, P.S.- Maharajganj, District- Siwan.

10. Most. Sanmato Kuwar, wife of Late Lan Singh

11. Most. Dewjhari Kuwar, wife of Late Suraj Singh Residents of village Sekhpura, P.S.- Rivilganj, District- Saran.

12. Shivjhari Devi, wife of Jagarnath Singh r/o- village Sabili, P.S.- Baikunthpur, District- Gopalganj.

13. Ugar Narayan Singh,

14. Jit Narayan Singh, Both sons of late Jaga Singh, residents of village Bagra, P.S.- Mashrakh, District- Saran.

15. Smt. Pato Devi, wife of Ramagya Singh, resident of village Nachap, P.S.- Akema, District- Saran.

16. Smt. Manpato Devi, wife of Shiv Shankar Singh, r/o- village Sadha Newaji Tola, P.S.- Chapra Town, District- Saran.

17. Smt. Munesari Devi, wife of Satrudhan Singh, r/o- Barui, P.s.- Baniyapur, District- Saran.

18. Smt. Bachha Devi, wife of Lal Babu Singh, r/o- village Sabuli, P.s.- Baikunthpur, District- Saran.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. Rajesh Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 28-08-2015 Heard the Counsel for the petitioner.

Patna High Court CWJC No.6764 of 2011 (3) dt.28-08-2015 2/2 At a very belated stage, the application of the plaintiff filed for amending the plaint was considered and rejected. I have perused the reasons assigned by the Court in doing so. No interference is required with the said order by invocation of writ jurisdiction of this Court. The counsel, at this stage, submits that the issues raised herein shall be raised in the appeal to be filed by the plaintiff-petitioner.

The application is dismissed.

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) Pankaj/- U T