← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39949/2022bail rejected

Sonu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-03-21Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39949 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-110 Year-2021 Thana- SIWAN CITY District- Siwan ====================================================== SONU KUMAR Son of Surendar Sah @ Surendra Shah Resident of Village - Navi Nagar, Police Station - Jamui, District- Jamui. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bijay Prakash Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Parmanand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 21-03-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Siwan Town P.S. Case No. 110 of 2021, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. The informant of this case is Rajdeo Singh, who is Principal of a Degree College. He has stated that he holds a bank account along with one Madhusudan Singh. The petitioner on 29.01.2021 and 25.01.2021 transferred Rs. 8,25,000/- and Rs. 9,65,000/- respectively by playing fraud and forgery. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has not withdrawn the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39949 of 2022(4) dt.21-03-2023 2/2 money deposited in his account. He has submitted further that the bank employees has not been made accused in this case. On the other hand, the learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the petitioner is also accused in similar nature of cases. It is admitted fact that the abovementioned money has been deposited in the bank account of the petitioner.

Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances as well as the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant him on bail. Accordingly, it is rejected.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Nirmal/Kundan U T