Bhukhan Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40714 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-35 Year-2025 Thana- GANGTA District- Munger ====================================================== Bhukhan Manjhi S/o Late Mohan Manjhi R/o vill- Sharma, Ps- Ganga, District- Munger ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Deep Anshuman, Advocate Mr. Suraj Kumar, Advocate Mr. Deep Nishi, Advocate Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 07-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Gangta P.S. Case No. 35 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 329(4), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, the petitioner along with other co-accused persons armed with various weapons assaulted son of the informant due to which he sustained injuries.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40714 of 2025(2) dt.07-07-2025 2/2 the petitioner also submits that the petitioner was not present at the place of occurrence. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is general and omnibus in nature and no specific allegation has been attributed against him. It is further submitted that the injury received by the informant's son is simple in nature caused by caused by hard and blunt object. The petitioner is in custody since 10.04.2025 and has got no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Gangta P.S. Case No. 35 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T