Pankaj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49161 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-325 Year-2021 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

PANKAJ KUMAR Son of Late Rajeshwar Sah Resident of Muhalla - Mubarakganj, Khirki Ghat, Ward No. - 25, P.S. - Sasaram (T), District - Rohtas at Sasaram 2.

Sangita Devi Wife of Manoj Prasad Daughter of Late Rajeshwar Sah, Resident of Muhalla - Mubarakganj, Khirki Ghat, Ward No. - 25, P.S. - Sasaram (T), District - Rohtas at Sasaram 3.

Chandani Devi Wife of Pankaj Kumar Resident of Muhalla - Mubarakganj, Khirki Ghat, Ward No. - 25, P.S. - Sasaram (T), District - Rohtas at Sasaram ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raghunandan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Section 307 & other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code.

From perusal of F.I.R., it is apparent that petitioner no. 1 namely Pankaj Kumar caused grievous injury to informant. So far as petitioner no. 2 & 3 are concerned, they are ladies and are alleged to have caused simple injury. There is case and counter case. Both parties are neighbours and due to petty dispute, some casual Maarpit took place between them. Petitioners have clean antecedent.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49161 of 2021(2) dt.21-06-2022 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner no. 1 is rejected. So far as prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner no. 2 and 3 is concerned, since they are ladies and are alleged to have caused simple injury, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, they are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sasaram (T) P.S. Case No. 325 of 2021, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay/- U T